File site/news/canoegnu.md added (mode: 100644) (index 0000000..2d0b0f1) |
|
1 |
|
% Should Canoeboot become GNU Canoeboot? |
|
2 |
|
% Leah Rowe |
|
3 |
|
% 12 May 2024 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
As many readers know, Libreboot abandoned the GNU FSDG policy in November 2022, |
|
6 |
|
instead opting for a [different policy](policy.md) allowing blobs only under |
|
7 |
|
the most limited circumstances, to allow newer machines to be supported from |
|
8 |
|
coreboot. This policy of Libreboot will remain. |
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
However, a minority of people disliked this move, and are yearning for a |
|
11 |
|
project much like the old one. Libreboot used to be entirely blob-free; coreboot |
|
12 |
|
is otherwise free software, but requires blobs on some mainboards, so Libreboot |
|
13 |
|
previously could not support all mainboards from Coreboot. |
|
14 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
I've been maintaining my own fork of Libreboot since October 2023, called |
|
16 |
|
Canoeboot. See: |
|
17 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
<https://canoeboot.org/> |
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
With the recent Canoeboot 20240510 release, I've decided: Canoeboot should |
|
21 |
|
become a GNU project. |
|
22 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Therefore, I sent GNU Eval an email requesting that they review it, laying the |
|
24 |
|
case for GNU membership. This will apply to *Canoeboot*, not Libreboot, since |
|
25 |
|
Canoeboot is the only one of the two that fully complies with their policies. |
|
26 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
That email is published here (replies will not be published): |
|
28 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
<https://canoeboot.org/news/gnu.html> |
|
30 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
In it, I make a strong case in support of membership, and I encourage members |
|
32 |
|
of the public to also voice their opinions about this topic. Therefore, I have |
|
33 |
|
publicised this link in several places: |
|
34 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Thread on FSF LibrePlanet mailing list: |
|
36 |
|
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libreplanet-discuss/2024-05/msg00001.html> |
|
37 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Thread on my Mastodon account: |
|
39 |
|
<https://mas.to/@libreleah/112428793049670713> |
|
40 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Thread on Trisquel forums (FSF endorsed GNU+Linux distro, and de-facto stomping |
|
42 |
|
ground for many debates within the FSF community): |
|
43 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
<https://trisquel.info/en/forum/should-gnu-boot-become-gnu-canoeboot> |
|
45 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Discussion welcome! |
|
47 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
I'm taking a very much hands-off approach with this; I've sent the initial |
|
49 |
|
email and asked the public what they think, so it's up to them to say what |
|
50 |
|
they think. |
|
51 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Whether Canoeboot is accepted or not, it will continue operating along its |
|
53 |
|
current course, providing a viable coreboot distro for diehard purisms who |
|
54 |
|
adhere to the FSF and GNU project. |
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
I've always believed absolutely in the Four Freedoms, as defined by the GNU |
|
57 |
|
Free Software Definition; Libreboot merely takes a different approach these |
|
58 |
|
days in implementing it, while Canoeboot takes an approach that is precisely |
|
59 |
|
in line with that of the FSF. In so doing, I provide users with a choice of |
|
60 |
|
which vision they prefer, and I try as best I can to faithfully serve both |
|
61 |
|
communities. |
|
62 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
That's all for now. I'm probably expecting that nothing will come of this, but |
|
64 |
|
the intend is there. I'd be very happy though if they say yes! |