File site/news/10.md changed (mode: 100644) (index 5e05c46..e3ebad9) |
... |
... |
the erstwhile *gluglug* domain then redirecting to it, and I registered Minifree |
1515 |
1515 |
Ltd in the UK. Minifree is how I fund the Libreboot project, by selling computers |
Ltd in the UK. Minifree is how I fund the Libreboot project, by selling computers |
1516 |
1516 |
with Libreboot pre-installed. You can find it |
with Libreboot pre-installed. You can find it |
1517 |
1517 |
on [minifree.org](https://minifree.org/). |
on [minifree.org](https://minifree.org/). |
1518 |
|
|
|
1519 |
|
January 1st, 2025, UPDATE! |
|
1520 |
|
------------------------ |
|
1521 |
|
|
|
1522 |
|
And some facts discovered in February 2025 have also been added! |
|
1523 |
|
|
|
1524 |
|
### Cold Boot War II |
|
1525 |
|
|
|
1526 |
|
The truce of 2024 has ended. GNU did a talk during 38C3 conference, where |
|
1527 |
|
they spent at least *one third* of the talk, telling people to stop using |
|
1528 |
|
Libreboot, to stop promoting Libreboot, stop contributing to it. This is an |
|
1529 |
|
act of war against the Libreboot project. Their decision, in the talk, |
|
1530 |
|
demonstrated that they have all the same intentions that they originally had |
|
1531 |
|
in their LibrePlanet 2023 talk, that lead to the *first* Cold Boot War. Their |
|
1532 |
|
intent is that Libreboot must cease to exist, and that they must replace it; |
|
1533 |
|
they are not content simply with existing in their own right, rather, they want |
|
1534 |
|
their existence *to replace mine*. |
|
1535 |
|
|
|
1536 |
|
Intent matters. A lot of people might disagree, but the world runs on dreams. |
|
1537 |
|
What we do in the moment is just an manifestation of dreams. Their dream is |
|
1538 |
|
to *destroy the Libreboot project*. |
|
1539 |
|
|
|
1540 |
|
Therefore, Cold Boot War II was declared, in the early hours of January 1st, 2025. |
|
1541 |
|
There won't be much material difference as a result of this, but the consequence |
|
1542 |
|
is that there is no longer good will from Libreboot towards the GNU project. |
|
1543 |
|
|
|
1544 |
|
I *was* going to approach the GNU project and start a discussion about shutting |
|
1545 |
|
down the Canoeboot project, and merge it with GNU. As of January 2025, GNU's |
|
1546 |
|
own Libreboot fork *still* uses the same late 2021 coreboot and GRUB revisions |
|
1547 |
|
that it used when they started back in June 2023. As of December 2024, the |
|
1548 |
|
Canoeboot project used upstream revisions *from December 2024* and with |
|
1549 |
|
completely up to date documentation. |
|
1550 |
|
|
|
1551 |
|
Canoeboot is vastly superior to anything GNU would ever do, or has done. |
|
1552 |
|
Canoeboot's highly efficient [design](https://canoeboot.org/docs/maintain/) |
|
1553 |
|
is much simpler and more powerful in practise, doing *more* in fewer lines |
|
1554 |
|
of code - and it supports more hardware. Canoeboot is, at this time, interested |
|
1555 |
|
in more GM45-based Dell Latitude models and X4x-based Dell OptiPlex 780 variants, |
|
1556 |
|
among other ports. Other works are also planned. |
|
1557 |
|
|
|
1558 |
|
For those interested, GNU's anti-Libreboot talk is here (they also talk trash |
|
1559 |
|
about Canoeboot, though to a lesser extent than they do about Libreboot): |
|
1560 |
|
**https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHJ9m6HRwq0** |
|
1561 |
|
|
|
1562 |
|
In it, they strongly imply that all Libreboot boards use Intel FSP/MRC, which |
|
1563 |
|
isn't true. Everything up to Haswell uses completely free raminit; completely |
|
1564 |
|
free initialisation within coreboot. |
|
1565 |
|
|
|
1566 |
|
In general, Libreboot's [Binary Blob Reduction Policy](policy.md) dictates |
|
1567 |
|
that if Free Software *can* be used, it must be - as a result, many systems |
|
1568 |
|
supported by Libreboot, boot entirely with free software. Libreboot is a free |
|
1569 |
|
software project, whose primary goal is to increase software freedoms for users |
|
1570 |
|
by providing them with free boot firmware. And yet: the GNU talk strongly |
|
1571 |
|
suggests that Libreboot is a *proprietary software project*. |
|
1572 |
|
|
|
1573 |
|
In that same GNU talk, GNU directly states that I, Leah Rowe, am "against 100% |
|
1574 |
|
free software" - also false. I want everyone to use Free Software exclusively, |
|
1575 |
|
but the reality is that this is literally impossible, on any hardware. The |
|
1576 |
|
reason is strongly described in Libreboot's [Freedom Status](../freedom-status.md) |
|
1577 |
|
and [Binary Blob Reduction Policy](policy.md) pages. |
|
1578 |
|
|
|
1579 |
|
They lie and lie and lie about me and about the Libreboot project, because if |
|
1580 |
|
they actually discussed the [nuance](policy.md) of Libreboot policy, they are |
|
1581 |
|
worried that more people might agree with Libreboot. They don't care about the |
|
1582 |
|
reality; they are also hypocrites, since they still use Libreboot and Canoeboot |
|
1583 |
|
themselves. For example, in their FOSDEM 2025 talk about machine learning, the |
|
1584 |
|
executive director of the FSF is clearly using a Dell Latitude E6400: |
|
1585 |
|
<https://ftp.belnet.be/mirror/FOSDEM/video/2025/k1105/fosdem-2025-4818-fsf-s-criteria-for-free-machine-learning-applications.av1.webm>; |
|
1586 |
|
look about 46 minutes in and it shows the whole laptop. Their own project does |
|
1587 |
|
not support this laptop, only Libreboot and Canoeboot do! And neox told me on |
|
1588 |
|
IRC during February 2025 that he uses Libreboot on a ThinkPad T440p. So... why |
|
1589 |
|
should anyone take them seriously? GNU policy has little merit - Libreboot ignores |
|
1590 |
|
it, because their policy limits the amount of hardware that can be supported - and |
|
1591 |
|
what merit does it have at all when its creators don't even follow it? As of |
|
1592 |
|
February 2025, Richard Stallman's own website still claims that he uses a |
|
1593 |
|
Libreboot system: <https://web.archive.org/web/20250211204821/https://www.stallman.org/stallman-computing.html>. |
|
1594 |
|
I could probably dig even deeper and find more examples, but you get the point. |
|
1595 |
|
|
|
1596 |
|
On merit, they are weak - and they don't even believe in their own merit. That |
|
1597 |
|
is why they need to attack the Libreboot project on their own project's website. |
|
1598 |
|
They could criticise just coreboot, which is the project they are actually dealing |
|
1599 |
|
with, but that's too hard; Libreboot is, to them, the easier target. They are |
|
1600 |
|
essentially cowards. Luckily, Libreboot and Canoeboot are literally *years ahead* |
|
1601 |
|
of them, on a technological level - and many of their people use Canoeboot and |
|
1602 |
|
Libreboot, because they get it: Libreboot is providing them with what they actually |
|
1603 |
|
need, namely, a free software boot project that tries to support as many machines |
|
1604 |
|
as possible, so it actually supports the hardware that they want to use. |
|
1605 |
|
|
|
1606 |
|
I was actually banned from the FSF's IRC channel on Libera, specifically because |
|
1607 |
|
I called neox (Adrien Bourmault) a hypocrite for using Libreboot, despite being |
|
1608 |
|
one of the co-founders of GNU's fork of Libreboot, that heavily criticises |
|
1609 |
|
Libreboot - and despite the fact that neox himself, in the above linked 38c3 |
|
1610 |
|
talk, heavily critises *me*. He lies, claiming that I oppose free software, |
|
1611 |
|
while using my project. Weak, weak, weak. I don't respect [hypocrites](https://vimuser.org/hypocrites.html) at all, |
|
1612 |
|
and neither should you. |
|