File site/news/10.md changed (mode: 100644) (index e3ebad9..f11fc0e) |
... |
... |
that Libreboot no longer strictly aligns to FSF policy, but I still very much |
60 |
60 |
believe in the ideology behind it. I merely apply it in different, more |
believe in the ideology behind it. I merely apply it in different, more |
61 |
61 |
[pragmatic](policy.md) ways - but this page is about the history of the project, |
[pragmatic](policy.md) ways - but this page is about the history of the project, |
62 |
62 |
so I have to put myself in the headspace I was in, during each development year |
so I have to put myself in the headspace I was in, during each development year |
63 |
|
relative to when Libreboot started. |
|
|
63 |
|
relative to when Libreboot started. Libreboot originally started very much as |
|
64 |
|
an FSF-endorsed project, created specifically for the purpose of adhering to |
|
65 |
|
their standards. |
64 |
66 |
|
|
65 |
67 |
### Early history |
### Early history |
66 |
68 |
|
|
|
... |
... |
This period of Libreboot's history involved a massive amount of extreme and |
1221 |
1223 |
hostile competition between the Libreboot project and a *hostile fork* of |
hostile competition between the Libreboot project and a *hostile fork* of |
1222 |
1224 |
Libreboot started by the FSF (now a GNU project). Libreboot fought hard to ensure |
Libreboot started by the FSF (now a GNU project). Libreboot fought hard to ensure |
1223 |
1225 |
that it, the *real* Libreboot project, the one on libreboot.org, survived, |
that it, the *real* Libreboot project, the one on libreboot.org, survived, |
1224 |
|
becauseu the FSF literally tried to destroy it. They made no secret of it, and |
|
|
1226 |
|
because the FSF literally tried to destroy it. They made no secret of it, and |
1225 |
1227 |
even publicly announced such intentions at their LibrePlanet 2023 conference. |
even publicly announced such intentions at their LibrePlanet 2023 conference. |
1226 |
1228 |
|
|
1227 |
1229 |
Much of the remainder of this article will cover this period, and its aftermath. |
Much of the remainder of this article will cover this period, and its aftermath. |
|
... |
... |
anymore; to do so was necessary, when they themselves did the same, because |
1478 |
1480 |
the FSF is a well-funded organisation with much bigger reach and would walk |
the FSF is a well-funded organisation with much bigger reach and would walk |
1479 |
1481 |
all over me if I allowed it, so it was necessary to show strength. |
all over me if I allowed it, so it was necessary to show strength. |
1480 |
1482 |
|
|
1481 |
|
However, throughout 2024, GNU's fork has essentially been a dead project; they |
|
1482 |
|
haven't done any work on their build system of any consequence, and haven't |
|
1483 |
|
even updated their documentation that heavily. Their main focus was on |
|
1484 |
|
integrating the Untitled Static Site Generator into their infrastructure, |
|
1485 |
|
which otherwise relies heavily on TexInfo documents and CVS (Untitled relies on |
|
1486 |
|
Markdown and Git heavily - the FSF actually made a special rsync server for |
|
1487 |
|
to manually upload HTML files to, generated by Untitled, which they |
|
1488 |
|
wrapped around directly, within their fork of the Libreboot build system). |
|
|
1483 |
|
I don't start fights; I only finish them, decisively and without fear or |
|
1484 |
|
prejudice. Aside from minor acts on GNU's part, they have largely left me well |
|
1485 |
|
alone since the end of 2023, and my intention is to leave them alone. I have |
|
1486 |
|
at times perhaps been guilty of overthinking, but I basically don't care about |
|
1487 |
|
the FSF or GNU at this point. |
|
1488 |
|
|
|
1489 |
|
My intention is that the FSF promote *Canoeboot*, much like they did with the |
|
1490 |
|
old Libreboot, prior to policy change. GNU Boot can do whatever it wants, I |
|
1491 |
|
don't really care; so long as they're not taking potshots at Libreboot. FSF can |
|
1492 |
|
also promote their own project (GNU Boot), as they have; there's room for both. |
|
1493 |
|
It'd be nice if GNU Boot criticised coreboot instead of Libreboot; coreboot is |
|
1494 |
|
the project that includes binary blobs, Libreboot merely tries to make the best |
|
1495 |
|
of a situation that is not ideal, while not being dogmatic; Canoeboot and GNU |
|
1496 |
|
Boot are dogmatic answers to the same issue, namely that hardware vendors suck. |
|
1497 |
|
Prior to Libreboot's policy change, Libreboot was not a fork of something; it |
|
1498 |
|
was its own original distribution, and it criticized the hardware vendors and |
|
1499 |
|
coreboot for not being firm enough with them - and this is a criticism that |
|
1500 |
|
I still have, today, and always will have. What more is there to say? GNU chose |
|
1501 |
|
to see me as its enemy, even though I'm ideologically very much in line with it |
|
1502 |
|
and wish to see its goals advanced to the fullest; the only difference with |
|
1503 |
|
Libreboot is the exact method by which this is strived for, a methodology that |
|
1504 |
|
they (the GNU project) vehemently disagree with. Libreboot's instrument is |
|
1505 |
|
the [Binary Blob Reduction Policy](policy.md), while Canoeboot's is |
|
1506 |
|
the [Binary Blob Extermination Policy](https://canoeboot.org/news/policy.html), |
|
1507 |
|
and Canoeboot's policy is very much identical to GNU's own policy document. |
1489 |
1508 |
|
|
1490 |
1509 |
Last remarks |
Last remarks |
1491 |
1510 |
----------- |
----------- |
|
... |
... |
the erstwhile *gluglug* domain then redirecting to it, and I registered Minifree |
1515 |
1534 |
Ltd in the UK. Minifree is how I fund the Libreboot project, by selling computers |
Ltd in the UK. Minifree is how I fund the Libreboot project, by selling computers |
1516 |
1535 |
with Libreboot pre-installed. You can find it |
with Libreboot pre-installed. You can find it |
1517 |
1536 |
on [minifree.org](https://minifree.org/). |
on [minifree.org](https://minifree.org/). |
|
1537 |
|
|
|
1538 |
|
*January 2025 update removed; hostilities briefly resumed, resulting from |
|
1539 |
|
accusations made by the GNU project against Libreboot and against me personally, |
|
1540 |
|
in a talk that they made at 38c3, but I've since decided to disregard it as being |
|
1541 |
|
that Adrien Bourmault simply doesn't know his place and spoke out of turn - I've |
|
1542 |
|
since begun discussions with the FSF and its executive director is remarkably |
|
1543 |
|
intelligent and decent, something I did not expect given my prior history - |
|
1544 |
|
more will be said about this, possibly, in future news updates, but not as |
|
1545 |
|
further updates to this 2023 article that you are currently reading. Good day!* |
|
1546 |
|
|
|
1547 |
|
*Some language on this page has been toned down, while not altering the substance |
|
1548 |
|
of this article in any way, and without removing any of the history or otherwise |
|
1549 |
|
any other information presented here. I remain wary of course, but my focus is |
|
1550 |
|
simply on Libreboot and Canoeboot - those people in GNU Boot such as Adrien |
|
1551 |
|
simply do not think the way I do and would likely never work with me. That is |
|
1552 |
|
why they have their project, and I have mine!!* |